Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 34
Filter
1.
Clinical Epileptology ; 36(1):45-51, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-20243284

ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess the course of COVID-19 infections and the tolerability of the mRNA vaccines of Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech and the viral vector vaccines from Astra Zeneca and Johnson & Johnson in adult patients with epilepsy (PWE). Method(s): From July 2020 to July 2021, we consecutively included adult outpatients with confirmed epilepsy. These PWE were interviewed about COVID-19 infections and vaccinations. Results of follow-up visits were added until the cut-off date (December 31, 2021). The data of COVID-19-infected without vaccinations or fully vaccinated PWE without COVID-19 infections were analyzed. Full vaccination was defined as a double vaccination with the Pfizer/BionTech, Moderna, or Astra Zeneca vaccines or a single Johnson & Johnson vaccination. Result(s): At cut-off, 612 of 1152 PWE fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 51 PWE had been infected without vaccination and 561 had full vaccination without infection. Among the infected PWE, 76.5% presented with symptoms;9.8% had a severe course (one death). The leading symptoms were influenza-like disorders (48.7% of infected PWE with symptoms), anosmia (28.2%), and ageusia (20.5%). Seizure increases or relapses after sustained seizure freedom occurred in 7.8%. Adverse events (AEs) were reported by 113 vaccinated PWE (20.1% of all vaccinated PWE). The leading AEs were fatigue, fever, and headache. The AE rate per vaccine was 14.0% for Pfizer/BionTech, 32.7% for Moderna, 25.8% for Astra Zeneca, and 46.2% for Johnson & Johnson. Of the AEs, 93.3% lasted <=1 week. Seizure increase or relapse occurred in 1.4% and was significantly less frequent than in the infected group (p= 0.0016). Conclusion(s): The course of COVID-19 infections and the tolerability of the vaccines were similar as in the general population, yet, seizure worsening occurred more often after the infection than after the vaccination.Copyright © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, part of Springer Nature.

2.
Kanzo/Acta Hepatologica Japonica ; 63(12):530-537, 2022.
Article in Chinese | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-20242878

ABSTRACT

The patient presented with nausea, appetite loss, and fatigue. She had received two doses of Pfizer/BioN-Tech BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine (COMIRNATY) for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Acute liver injury was noted 14 days after the first dose of the vaccine. Re-exposure through the second dose worsened the liver injury. After liver biopsy on the third day of admission, methylprednisolone (1000 mg) was administered. Liver histology showed acute hepatitis with diffuse lobular inflammation/necrosis and lymphocyte-dominant infiltra-tion in the portal areas. The patient was diagnosed with drug-induced liver injury due to the COVID-19 vaccine based on the Digestive Disease Week Japan 2004 (DDW-J) scale, which assesses the temporal relationship, liver biopsy, and laboratory findings. With improvements in the blood test parameters, prednisolone was gradually tapered and stopped. One month later, no biochemical signs of relapse were noted. To our knowledge, this is the first report describing liver injury after the administration of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in Japan.Copyright © 2022 The Japan Society of Hepatology.

3.
Yaoxue Xuebao ; 58(4):867-874, 2023.
Article in Chinese | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-20238681

ABSTRACT

Vaccination has been proved to be the most effective strategy to prevent the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). The mRNA vaccine based on nano drug delivery system (NDDS) - lipid nanoparticles (LNP) has been widely used because of its high effectiveness and safety. Although there have been reports of severe allergic reactions caused by mRNA-LNP vaccines, the mechanism and components of anaphylaxis have not been completely clarified yet. This review focuses on two mRNA-LNP vaccines, BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273. After summarizing the structural characteristics, potential allergens, possible allergic reaction mechanism, and pharmacokinetics of mRNA and LNP in vivo, this article then reviews the evaluation methods for patients with allergic history, as well as the regulations of different countries and regions on people who should not be vaccinated, in order to promote more safe injection of vaccines. LNP has become a recognized highly customizable nucleic acid delivery vector, which not only shows its value in mRNA vaccines, but also has great potential in treating rare diseases, cancers and other broad fields in the future. At the moment when mRNA-LNP vaccines open a new era of nano medicine, it is expected to provide some inspiration for safety research in the process of research, development and evaluation of more nano delivery drugs, and promote more nano drugs successfully to market.Copyright © 2023, Chinese Pharmaceutical Association. All rights reserved.

4.
Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology ; 38(1) (no pagination), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2323141

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Since its first appearance in Wuhan December 2019, SARS-CoV2 virus received great attention due to its severe symptoms and high spread causing COVID-19 disease which spread all over the world like a pandemic. The causative virus is capable of human-to-human transmission via droplet and direct contact suggesting that upper respiratory tract is the main site to virus manifestations. There is a great diversity in its clinical picture, although the severe respiratory and neurological symptoms are commonly present;however, other symptoms are present. Although otological manifestations are reported in many COVID-19 patients even in asymptomatic cases, they did not receive much attention compared with other critical manifestations. In this article, we paid our attention specifically to the otological manifestations of COVID-19 and their relevance either to the virus infection, treatment, or vaccination through literature review. Conclusion(s): COVID-19 disease has a deleterious effect on the inner ear. This effect is not only due to SARS-Cov-2 infection, but it could be also due to the ototoxic drugs used for treatment. The COVID-19 vaccinations are found to be implicated in the otological symptoms in some cases.Copyright © 2022, The Author(s).

5.
Flora ; 28(1):48-55, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2292535

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Studies are showing that a high antibody response increases the protection against variants in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between antibody response and side effects based on the number of doses administered to healthcare workers who were vaccinated against COVID-19. Material(s) and Method(s): Healthcare workers, who were vaccinated with two doses of BNT162b2 (Group 1), a single dose of BNT162b2 following two doses of CoronaVac (Group 2), or two doses of BNT162b2 following two doses of CoronaVac (Group 3), were randomly assigned to this study. Serum samples were taken from the participants 30 +/- 2 days after the last vaccination date, and the SARSCoV- 2 anti-spike S1 RBD IgG test was administered to these samples. A questionnaire was conducted detailing the demographics of the patients as well as their post-vaccination complaints. The results were analyzed statistically. Analysis results with a p-value of <0.05 were considered significant. Result(s): A total of 179 healthcare professionals with a mean age of 41.7 +/- 10.6 years were included in our study. Of the studied samples, 95.5% (n= 171) were interpreted as anti-spike S1 RBD IgG seropositive. Positivity rates and mean antibody levels were 93.2%, 95.9%, 97.8%, and 107.4 +/- 117.1, 152.7 +/- 108.5, 201.4 +/- 114.9 (AU/mL) for Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3, respectively (p< 0.05). In general, no significant differences in antibody response were seen based on gender or age. However, a significant correlation was found between the occurrence of vaccine-related side effects and antibody titer (p< 0.001). The most common side effect was pain in the area where the vaccine was administered, with a rate of 77.4% (n= 48). More vaccine-related side effects were reported in participants under the age of 40 and in female healthcare workers. Conclusion(s): We believe that booster doses are effective for increasing the immune response and thus protecting against COVID-19. More extensive research should be conducted to confirm the link between the occurrence of vaccine-related side effects and antibody titer. Furthermore, studies on the safety of increasing the number of vaccine doses are required.Copyright © 2023 Bilimsel Tip Yayinevi. All rights reserved.

6.
Neuroimmunology Reports ; 3 (no pagination), 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2291240

ABSTRACT

Background: Large-scale vaccination against the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) occurred globally at an unprecedented pace. Sporadic cases of autoimmune encephalitis (AE) have been reported following COVID-19 vaccination, mainly in adults. Case report: A 14-year-old girl developed altered mental status and was brought to our emergency department because of a seizure 19 days after receiving the third dose of COVID-19 vaccination. She was treated with steroid pulse therapy and fully recovered. The diagnosis of probable autoantibody-negative AE was finally made. Conclusion(s): This case met the criteria for probable autoantibody-negative AE in children, as well as adults. Because of the temporal association and absence of another identifiable cause, her conditions may have been triggered by the COVID-19 vaccination. To our knowledge, this is the first published pediatric case of autoantibody-negative but probable AE following COVID-19 vaccination.Copyright © 2023 The Authors

7.
World's Veterinary Journal ; 13(1):12-25, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2306340

ABSTRACT

Adenovirus vectors have been employed to develop a vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) for curtailing the Covid-19 pandemic spreading. Many different viral vectors have been mainly targeting the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein as an antigen. Spike (S) protein is comprised of S1 and S2 subunits, in which the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of S1 is responsible for recognizing and engaging with its host cellular receptor protein angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), S2 accounts for membrane fusion of virus and host cell. Chimpanzee adenovirus was also used as a vector vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 (ChAdSARS-CoV-2-S) by intramuscular injection, and intranasal administration has been tested. Adenovirus vector-based vaccines are the most advanced, with several vaccines receiving Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). It was shown that rhesus macaques were protected from SARS-CoV-2 challenge after a month of being vaccinated with ChAd-SARS-CoV-2-S. A single intranasal or two intramuscular ChAd-SARSCoV-2-S vaccines could induce humoral antibodies and T cell responses to protect the upper and lower respiratory tract against SARS-CoV-2. As the effectiveness was demonstrated in non-human primates, ChAd-SARS-CoV-2-Sa potential option for preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans. However, detecting novel more transmissible and pathogenic SARS-CoV-2 variants added concerns about the vaccine efficacy and needs monitoring. Moreover, the cause of recently documented rare cases of vaccine indicated immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. This review article provided details for the adenovirus vector vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 in humans and tried to provide solutions to the adenovirus vector hemagglutinin issueCopyright © 2023, World's Veterinary Journal.All Rights Reserved.

8.
Clinical Immunology Communications ; 3:1-5, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2305064

ABSTRACT

The pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus has been especially detrimental to patients with end-stage renal disease. History with other vaccines suggests that patients with renal disease may not respond adequately to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The aim of this study is to evaluate the immunity to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in renal patients. Post SARS-CoV-2 vaccination first, and after the booster dose, antibodies and cellular immunity were studied in patients on hemodialysis (N = 20), peritoneal dialysis (N = 10) and renal transplantation (N = 10). After the two doses of vaccine, there was an effective immunity in dialysis patients, with 100% seroconversion and 87% detection of cellular immunity (85% in hemodialysis and 90% in peritoneal dialysis). In contrast, in renal transplant recipients there was only 50% seroconversion and cellular immunity was detected in 30% of patients. After the booster dose, all dialysis patients achieved a cellular and antibody immunity, whereas in transplant patients, despite improvement, 20% did not produce antibodies and in 37.5% cellular immunity could not be detected. The mRNA vaccine plus booster performs excellently in dialysis patients, whereas in kidney transplant recipients, despite the booster, complete immunization is not achieved.Copyright © 2022

9.
Neuroimmunology Reports ; 2 (no pagination), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2299562

ABSTRACT

Background Management of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and evidence of disease activity during treatment with cladribine tablets represents a challenging point. Objectives To report a patient with highly active multiple sclerosis (HAMS) who has been early switched from cladribine to alemtuzumab owing to tumultuous clinical and radiological activity Methods A single retrospective case report. Results. Treatment with alemtuzumab has led to a complete suppression of disease activity without any evidence of infections or acquired autoimmune diseases. Conclusion Our report suggests that an early switch from cladribine to alemtuzumab, may be safe and efficacious in selected HAMS cases.Copyright © 2022 The Authors

10.
Rivista Italiana della Medicina di Laboratorio ; 18(3):148-156, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2298362

ABSTRACT

Background: Vaccination is considered the most effective preventive strategy to fight COVID-19. The aim of this study was to evaluate two critical concerns about: 1) the kinetic response of IgG and IgM, and: 2) the hematological abnormalities in a longitudinal cohort of health-care workers (HCW) who had received 2 doses of BNT162b2 mRNA-based vaccine. Method(s): Blood and nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from 46 volunteers' participants, previous written consensus, with presumable no symptoms of COVID-19. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) and M (IgM) and hematological parameters were examined. Multivariable mixed-effects models for repeated measure analysis were adopted to evaluate time changes in IgG, IgM and hematological parameters, and to investigate associations with vaccination response. Result(s): Forty-six subjects (N.=46;31.8% men;68.2% women;mean age near 36 years-old) were enrolled among healthcare workers of IRCCS MultiMedica (Milan, Italy). Overall, increase in serological IgG concentration appeared mainly between 21-28 days after the 1st dose, whereas IgM did not reach positivity in all cases. Mean blood cells counts were in normal range but we observed a significant reduction of total white blood cells and absolute lymphocyte counts after the 1st dose, persisting until the day 28. The increase of monocytes and neutrophils the day after the 1st dose subsequently decayed significantly. Eosinophils concentration showed a tendency to increase over time. Peripheral blood smear showed a growing frequency of atypical lymphocytes (lympho-variants), and of plasmacytoid forms, whereas no difference was found in large granular lymphocytes (LGL), although a decay after the boost was evident. The stratification of subjects, relative to the timing of IgG increase, showed the occurrence of 3 different patterns after vaccination, namely early-responders (R+), late-responders (R-) and pauci-responders (PR) with a peculiar kinetics of hematological parameters. Lymphocytes were significantly associated with total IgG: lower in R+ and PR compared to R- (P=0.0193 and P=00054, respectively). Conclusion(s): In healthy subjects, anti SARS-CoV-2 vaccination induced a variety of non-pathologic abnormalities. The response to vaccination was not equal in the groups examined. In PR group a major difference occurred with respect to R- and R+. This work adds novel insight into the puzzle of changes induced by SARS-CoV-2 virus.Copyright © 2022 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA.

11.
Journal of Liver Transplantation ; 4 (no pagination), 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2298219
12.
Journal of the Formosan Medical Association ; 122(5):361-363, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2297496
13.
Journal of Liver Transplantation ; 8 (no pagination), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2297028
14.
Neuroimmunology Reports ; 2 (no pagination), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2296234

ABSTRACT

Purpose:: To report a case of anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AION) following COVID-19 vaccination and provide a systematic review of all published cases of optic neuropathy following COVID-19 vaccination. Method(s):: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE for cases of optic neuropathy following COVID-19 vaccination. Terms used in the search included "COVID-19 vaccination", "optic neuropathy", "optic neuritis", and "ischemic optic neuropathy". Titles and s were initially screened then full texts of eligible studies were reviewed for data extraction. Only cases published in the English language, peer reviewed, and that included details on optic nerve involvement were included. All study types were eligible for inclusion. Result(s):: Including our patient, a total of 10 patients (8 females) were identified as developing optic neuropathy following COVID-19 vaccination. Five patients (50.0%) were diagnosed with AION, while 4 (40.0%) were diagnosed with optic neuritis. One patient was diagnosed with papillitis and neuroretinitis. Three patients (30.0%) had bilateral involvement. Mean age of patients was 48.5+/-19.7 years. Mean time from vaccination to onset of ophthalmic symptoms was 6.5+/-6.4 days. Median (IQR) presenting visual acuity was logMAR 0.3 (0-1). For the 8 eyes which had both presenting and final follow-up visual acuity, median (IQR) presenting vision was logMAR 0.2 (0-0.7) and at final follow-up was logMAR 0 (0-0.05) (P=0.184). Conclusion(s):: COVID-19 vaccination may result in optic neuropathy in the form of optic neuritis and ischemic optic neuropathy. Further studies are needed to determine the incidence, management, and prognosis of optic neuropathies associated with COVID-19 vaccination.Copyright © 2022

15.
The Lancet Infectious Diseases ; 23(3):263-264, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2276970
16.
Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology ; 17(1):69-79, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2272579

ABSTRACT

Paediatric population is the high-risk segment for the infection of COVID-19 due to weak immune status and low compliance to COVID-19 prevention protocols. The first dose of vaccination for the paediatric population is started in the fifth phase of vaccination, after the vaccination was administered to health workers, elderly individuals, and young adults. Present article aims to analyse the status, trends, and challenges in the implementation of the paediatric vaccination for COVID-19 and provide recommendations that could be taken under consideration by healthcare authorities while designing the second and third vaccination protocols for the paediatric population. Relevant articles published by various journals related to paediatric COVID-19 vaccination were searched from the different databases and analysed for the current status of vaccination, trends, challenges, compliance level, implementation hurdles, and other relevant information. Limited research is available in the paediatric domain for the COVID-19 vaccination. Few vaccines are approved for the paediatric population in India, including the Covaxin, ZyCoV-D, Corbevax and Covovax. It is recommended that the vaccination trials should be accelerated by the government agencies to make COVID vaccines available from other indigenous manufacturers. It is also recommended that the COVID-19 prevention protocol should be made in such a manner that children find that interesting and like to follow them.Copyright © The Author(s) 2023.

17.
Journal of Laboratory and Precision Medicine ; 7 (no pagination), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2271338

ABSTRACT

Predicting the humoral, cellular and clinical response to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination remains a central aspect for efficiently tackling the ongoing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. Several current studies have focused on predicting the clinical response to COVID-19 vaccination by testing both immunological and cellular biomarkers. Nonetheless, this strategy is plagued by a number of drawbacks, so that a "biological marker" which may help predicting vaccine efficacy, efficiently surrogating laboratory-based tests, would be a valuable resource for optimizing vaccine delivery. A number of recent studies, summarized in this clinical practice review, have repeatedly emphasized the existence of a significant relationship between increased body temperature and humoral response after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination. Therefore, we put forward the idea that fever should be no longer considered only an adverse (almost undesirable) post-vaccination side effect, wherein its onset may actually reflect enhanced immunological response to vaccine, and its measurement could hence be used for screening at least mRNA-based vaccine immunogenicity in terms of humoral response up to 3 months after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination by using specifically validated algorithms incorporating the integrate assessment of body temperature and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.Copyright © Journal of Laboratory and Precision Medicine. All rights reserved.

18.
Neuroimmunology Reports ; 2 (no pagination), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2267708

ABSTRACT

Background: There have been reports of demyelinating syndromes in association with COVID-19 and to a much lesser extent COVID 19 vaccines. The association between demyelination and vaccines, in general, remains controversial. We review a presentation of fulminant demyelination, and discuss antecedent COVID-19 vaccination, the formulation of a broader differential diagnosis and ultimately the pathologic diagnosis. Case presentation: An 80-year-old woman presented with seizure, encephalopathy, quadriparesis and ultimately expired. She received a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine one day prior. Imaging revealed contrast enhancing cerebral lesions, longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis. CSF was markedly inflammatory. Pathologic examination of the CNS lesions revealed demyelination and inflammation beyond white matter, not restricted to a perivenular distribution. Conclusion(s): This case depicts a seemingly fulminant course of a diffuse demyelinating syndrome characterized clinicopathologically as Marburg's variant of multiple sclerosis. There are several unique aspects of this case including the extremely rapid course, the unusual evolution of CSF abnormalities, with hypoglycorrhachia and markedly elevated protein. The proximity to vaccination is a pertinent association to document, though we cannot unequivocally prove causation.Copyright © 2022 The Authors

19.
Journal of Laboratory Medicine ; 47(1):41-45, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2267163

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Administration of the third dose of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine was initiated on December 1, 2021, in Japan. However, data on the long-term effects of this third vaccination remain scarce. Here, we examined the levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in those who received the Pfizer BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccine, 6 months after the third vaccination. Method(s): Samples from 40 healthy volunteers were used to measure SARS-CoV-2 antibodies with chemiluminescent assays against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the virus. Result(s): At 445 days after the first dose of BNT162b2, which is 180 days after the third vaccination, the mean anti-RBD IgG level was 159.4 AU/mL (SD 100.1 AU/mL), which was significantly higher than 144 days after the second vaccination, while mean anti-RBD IgM was baseline level (0.4 C.O.I.). The decline in IgG, 180 days after the third vaccination, was 74.1% (SD 16.1%), which was significantly lower than the 88.6% (SD 4.4%) decline observed 144 days after the second vaccination. Furthermore, we revealed that the reduction in IgG from 14 to 180 days after the third vaccination showed a significant inverse correlation with age, and the higher antibody response in younger participants at 14 days after the third vaccination disappeared at longer time points. Conclusion(s): The long-term durability of the IgG titer was significantly higher following the third vaccination compared with the second vaccination, and the reduction in IgG titer after the third vaccination inversely correlated with age.Copyright © 2022 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.

20.
Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology ; 16(1):465-469, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2265392

ABSTRACT

Vaccination is an effective, simple, safeway of providing protection against harmful diseases, before contact with public. Vaccination develops immunity to particular infections and makes our immune system stronger to produce antibodies. Most of the vaccines are administered by parenteral route, but few are given by mouth or sprayed into the nose.We should believe fair and equitable access to safe and effective vaccines is only weapon to end the pandemic, so WHO is hugely working with an effort to encourage the partners to develop and manufacture safe and effective vaccines, a challenging game tool, but in the future we must continue wearing masks, sanitizing our hands, with good ventilation indoors, physical distancing and avoid crowding. Being vaccinated does not mean that we can throw caution to the wind and put ourselves and others at risk, particularly because research is still ongoing on how much vaccines gives protection against disease, infection and transmission.Vaccines may not guarantee protection from infection, they are still doing an amazing job of substantially reducing hospitalization and death related to Covid 19.Copyright © RJPT. All right reserved.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL